Another iPhone and another gate. The effort to find the weak points of each new phone that Apple launches on the market seems to be something common., something normal if you take into account the impact that this generates in the sector, yes, but it can reach absurd points on some occasions. So much as to make us believe that certain particularities matter.
El network connection module and a supposed lower SSD speed on 32GB model With respect to those with greater capacity, gates of this year, that are intended solely to cause outrage among some users, getting it, actually. If you're one of them, don't worry, this shouldn't keep you awake.
It is not that I consider that these peculiarities of the iPhone 7 are simple defamations or musings of some user obsessed in highlighting the most idiotic failure, since in the information that has arrived it seems to be true that, When you put two iPhone 7s with the differences indicated to work in parallel and you observe the results, indeed, the result is different. And that is precisely where the problem lies: you have to do exactly the same thing, on two different devices and at the same time to realize it.
Who does that?
There will probably always be someone willing to "test" even the smallest of aspects, but certainly not the vast majority of users. And what is better: we would never realize this kind of thing if it weren't for the fact that they show us. I am not saying that it is wrong for this information to come to light, since the more we know about our device, the better; but the problem comes when this is presented as a very serious error which makes our terminal a despicable object.
It is natural for a company with such a great demand for a product to diversify production, giving rise to these types of circumstances because, even today, the technology is extremely imperfect. Is it a mistake on Apple's part to do this? No, as long as it does not affect our daily use in a differentiating way, which does not happen in these cases. Maybe we should stop being guided so much by tests and closed checks and start enjoying more of the excellent product that is the iPhone 7.
And why shouldn't we comment on the weak points of a device whose average cost is no less than $ 1000?
Hi, I've been using a 7GB iPhone 32 for a month. I see a 6 Plus s and the truth is, the difference is noticeable. Stereo sound, not from two speakers, one bass and the other treble, takes a thousand turns out of any other smartphone I've tried. The image stabilizer is appreciated although I do not notice big differences in quality in the shots. I think it is still behind the S7. That memory is slower? Well look, I have compared it in antutu with other devices and this one is much better and flow in the image section. I haven't heard any hum from the processor or anything like that. These ultra-analyzes that reach the metaphysical also seem silly to me.
Everyone sticking their ear to listen to buzzing and nonsense, I am not saying that some do not fail like everything in life, but they look for things where there is not the same noise of the processor that the 6s does that does not bother or hear anything, and so on the rest, which is the fashion to explode, because we also put iphone exploding, in short ……. Whoever likes to buy it and whoever doesn't, take the one that seems best to him, the problem seems to me that it comes from those who want it and don't have it, my iphone 7 plus 128gb is perfect like all the iPhones I've had and The price of course is expensive but the same as the high-end of sansumg or is it that the galaxy edge went on sale for € 100?
If 2 people pay exactly the same price for the same product, it seems perfect to me that the same quality is required for both. I have every right to, for example, demand the same connection speed as the other… because they charged me the same as him. I also defend the "gates" and other exposures that people make regarding the defects of the devices, because they are advertised as the best in the market, they charge them as such and if it weren't for these leaks there might not have been a 4s with the solution to the «gate antenna» or a 6s with aluminum 7000 for the «bendgate». Gentlemen, do not be sick fans of a brand and justify any situation because it is Apple ... you pay for the products, you do not give them away, and thanks to these people (among other issues), Apple ... Samsung, etc, each year you have to demand more so that we are more satisfied. Do not defend a brand, defend yourselves.
If 2 people pay exactly the same price for the same product, it seems perfect to me that the same quality is required for both. I have every right to, for example, demand the same connection speed as the other… because they charged me the same as him. I also defend the "gates" and other exposures that people make regarding the defects of the devices, because they are advertised as the best in the market, they charge them as such and if it weren't for these leaks there might not have been a 4s with the solution to the «gate antenna» or a 6s with aluminum 7000 for the «bendgate». Gentlemen, do not be sick fans of a brand and justify any situation because it is Apple ... you pay for the products, you do not give them away, and thanks to these people (among other issues), Apple ... Samsung, etc, each year you have to demand more so that we are more satisfied. Do not defend a brand, defend yourselves.