El The FBI has asked Apple for precautionary measures to be able to access the iOS system and thus improve security by preventing the firm's mobile devices from being used in the commission of crimes. However, the problem is that the authorities want Apple to skip all its regulations, that iOS ceases to be what it is and that mobile data is at the service of the police, privacy being completely annulled. Obviously, the apple has answered no, but today it wanted to explain the reasons behind it.
Upon request to create a only iOS system that can be accessed with brute force The company has requested that something be considered erroneous because if access and protection of the data is lost, then the security of these is lost. Precisely in this regard, the company also wanted to add that the initial code is the safest formula to keep the iPhone safe from anything. So it does not seem that there will be assignments in that area.
But it doesn't look like Apple is going to fall short when it comes to show your discomfort at the request. In fact, you have also argued in your guide as to why the FBI should not have full access to any conversation that was made or received from an iPhone. Although in this case he does not explain much about his thesis, he does consider that it would be a very bad precedent and would violate people's freedom. The continuous argument about the line that separates privacy and security continues to make the apple talk and continues to pit it against security forces who want encryption not to affect them. What do you think of the conumicado?
For the first time I like something from apple and it is that position, I hope you keep it
If the son of Tim Cook or some other senior executive died in a situation similar to that of these shootings, the first thing Apple would do would be to unlock the iCloud account of anyone related to the event in order to clarify the death of that relative.
Come on, don't come with this high level of hypocrisy ……
Document yourself well first brother before speaking, the BFI does not only want them to unlock one Icloud, they want to be able to enter all the Icloud. Have that privilege that neither Apple nor anyone else has.
And if you hadn't fallen on your head at birth, you wouldn't say this nonsense ... what if and if ... absurd assumptions. It is a stance, in favor of privacy.
The FBI has a million ways to be your big brother, and apple doesn't want him to have millions plus one. Ole for them.
For my part, what Gaston says seems very correct, that if he were a relative of Tim, they would find out.
We have to go after the terrorists straightforwardly just as they take our lives
and your Toño do not be so hypocritical, if it affected you, you would try to find out
I do believe that they should unlock the terrorist's iphone, but exclusively that one, I don't believe that they should create software or some way to unlock another.
Fortunately, these things are not decided "hot". If we ask Marta del Castillo's parents about the death penalty, they are surely in favor now, and 20 years ago, against. The choices that affect the future and millions of people must be taken coldly by people isolated from the problem. If not, this would be a state of exception ... and we are on our way to it.
And the question is: What do all those who are not in favor of the FBI have to hide? ...
The answer is simple ... EVERYTHING. Privacy makes us unique individuals. If not, we become part of the herd. They know what you like, they know what channels you watch, what clothes you wear, what friends you have and what you wear at parties… Are you not surprised to see that Google sends you advertising about things that you have searched for and / or visited in the last few days? It is not conspiracy, it is not apocalyptic, it is simply seeing reality. We are constantly watched, monitored, persecuted ...
The FBI is going against a terrorist today, tomorrow against Kim Dot Com, and incidentally against all those who have downloaded an illegal movie ... does anyone have something to hide? Maybe not now, but in a few months, what you do now may be illegal.