La security of our mobile devices and the applications that we use in our day to day has always been in between. And it is that in the end we store a large amount of information on our devices that we all want to protect so that they do not fall into the wrong hands ...
But, are you sure that the security of your devices is important to you? The spokesperson for the British government, Amber Rudd, just said that the real people don't want end-to-end security in messaging services, they want new features instead of security ... After the jump we give you all the details of these controversial statements.
Who uses WhatsApp for its end-to-end encryption, rather than using it because it is a service easy to use and a cheap way to be in contact with your friends and family? This is not about asking companies to break encryption or create rear doors.
This is part of the statement that Amber Rudd made to the San Francisco media after meeting with several Companies technology in the field of counterterrorism cybernetic, where he has spoken about his concern about the security of the devices that may protect possible terrorists
All the companies constantly invest in security and usability, and this is where our experts think they can lie. The real people usually prefer usability and new features versus security impassable. When there is a particular need, that is where there is a necessary goal.
But as he said Facebook COO, Sheryl Sandberg, after the controversial statements: «if people use these protected services governments have less information, not more. » And this is something completely true, we return to the theories of Gran Hermano, control of all information that circulates through all channels, something quite worrying. And the question really would be, what do governments really want to have unlimited access to all our information? Something quite worrying and that undoubtedly generates a great debate. And you, Are you agree with handing over all your information to your governments in exchange for "more security"?
I believe that the governments already have our necessary data, that you have to go to vote, they have your address, they put a traffic fine on you, they have your address, there is a tax to pay, they already have your address, from here on Forget to get more data, I am not going to do without security simply so that governments let you know what country, I can know what I am talking about with my friends, family, co-workers ... there is a law that talks about the right to privacy and privacy, and no government is or has to be above that.
That someone does not care about security and the possibility that someone can access all your data, contacts, photos and other things, it seems good to me, that you buy a Samsung, since with Apple this will not have it.