Mahaliccin emoticons tare da launuka daban-daban na fata sun tuhumi Apple

Shekaru da yawa, Apple, kamar sauran dandamali, sun ba mu damar bayyana kanmu tare emoticons tare da launuka daban-daban na fata, ra'ayin da ba nata ba ne amma Katrina Parrot's, wanda ya gurfanar da Apple kawai don amfani da wadannan maganganun a cikin iOS, abubuwan da ta kirkira ta hanyar aikace-aikacen iDiversicons.

Katrina ta kai kamfanin Apple kara keta hakkin mallaka. Kamar yadda zamu iya karantawa The Washington Post, an gayyaci wannan mai haɓaka zuwa ofisoshin Apple a cikin 2013 don gabatar da ra'ayinta, amma a ƙarshe ba su cimma wata yarjejeniya mai fa'ida ba.

Ya kasance 2013, emoticons sun wakilci mutane tare da launin fata ɗaya kawai. Parrott, wacce baƙar fata ce, ta ce babbar ɗiyarta ta dawo daga kwaleji wata rana kuma ta yi makoki cewa ba za ta iya bayyana kanta ta hanyar emoji da launin fata wanda ya yi daidai da nata ba.

Da wannan ra'ayin a zuciya, ƙaddamar da aikace-aikacen iDiversicons akan App Store Watanni 6 bayan haka, aikace-aikacen da ya ba masu amfani damar kwafa da liƙa emojis tare da sautunan fata daban-daban a aikace-aikacen saƙonni.

Koyaya, Apple da wasu kamfanoni sun ƙara emojis ɗin tare da sautunan fata daban-daban akan tsarin aikin su, don haka manhajar ta hanzarta daina yin ma'ana.

Apple ya kare kansa daga wannan zargin ta hanyar bayyana cewa:

Hakkokin mallaka ba su kare ra'ayin amfani da sautunan fata daban-daban guda biyar zuwa emojis, saboda ra'ayoyi ba sa ƙarƙashin kariyar haƙƙin mallaka.

Bugu da ƙari kuma, yana da'awar cewa ya haɓaka bambancin al'adu na maganganu da kansa, ba tare da kwafin aikin Katrina ba. Wani lauya da aka nemi shawararsa The Washington Post ya ce shari'ar za ta kasance abu mai wahala don cin nasara kasancewar emojis ba su da kama daya kwata-kwata kuma "gaskiyar cewa ta zo da ra'ayin tun farko bai isa ba."