Uyalikhumbula "Ibali eliNgxamile"? Ewe, ukuba bekungekho ngenxa yokuba engasekho nathi, uMichael Ende, umbhali wayo, ngewayenaye kwityala lika-Apple nxamnye ne-Samsung malunga nokophula umthetho welungelo elilodwa lomenzi ngaphezu kokubhala Ibali lokuThintela II, kuba yile nto kanye le ingxabano yomthetho - yezoqoqosho - yokuziphatha iba, "ibali elingenasiphelo" Emva kweminyaka engaphezu kwemihlanu etsibela kwinkundla yamatyala, usandula ukubuyiselwa kwindawo apho iqale khona yonke into, ukuqala ngokutsha.
Isamsung, eyathi ngemini yayo yaxhasa isigwebo seNkundla ePhakamileyo esathi ukulinganiswa komonakalo wokophula umthetho welungelo elilodwa lomenzi wechiza kufuneka kufakwe kwizinto ezizezinye hayi kwisixhobo sonke, nesohlwayo saso sancitshiswa ukuya kwisiqingatha ukusuka Iibhiliyoni zeedola ukuya ngaphezulu kwamakhulu amahlanu, ngoku ibonile indlela Inkundla yeziBheno yaseMelika ibuyisela inkqubo kwisihlalo sayo sokuqala, ukuze inyanzelise isigwebo. Isivakalisi, ukuba elinye iqela alithandi, izakuqala inkqubo entsha enokuhlala eminye iminyaka emihlanu.
Impikiswano esemthethweni ka-Apple ngokuchasene ne-Samsung ibuyela kwibhokisi yokuqala
Inkundla yase-United States yezibheno kwi-Federal Circuit ikhuphe i-odolo ngolwe-Lwesibini ngokubhekisele kwityala lika-Apple nxamnye ne-Samsung lokophula umthetho welungelo lomenzi libuyiselwe kwisihlalo semvelaphi, iNkundla yeSithili saseMantla se-California. Iya kuba yile nkundla ingezantsi ekufuneka isombulule imbambano phakathi kweenkampani zombini zobuchwephesha, yona kunokukhokelela kwityala elitsha lomonakalo.
Ngelixa iApple icela ukuba uphononongo luqhubeke, i-Samsung icela ukuba sibhekise kwinkundla yesithili malunga netyala elitsha lomonakalo. Endaweni yokuba sibhekise eli tyala kwinkundla yesithili ukuze liqhubeke, elinokuthi libandakanye okanye lingabandakanyi ityala elitsha lomonakalo.Kutsho isithethi sikarhulumente.
Njengoko sele sihambile ngasentla, esi sigqibo siza kwiinyanga nje ezimbalwa emva kweNkundla ePhakamileyo yaseMelika umthetho uxhasa i-Samsung ukuba ukubalwa komonakalo wokophula umthetho welungelo elilodwa lomenzi kuyilo kuya kusebenza kuphela kwizinto ezizezinye ze-smartphone, kodwa hayi kwisiphelo sonke. Oku kuthetha ukuba izohlwayo ezinxulumene nokwaphulwa kwelungelo elilodwa lomenzi wechiza akufuneki zibalwe ngokusekwe kwintengiso yezixhobo ezipheleleyo.
Umahluko: "inqaku lokwenziwa"
U-Case Collard, iqabane lenkampani yamagqwetha yamazwe aphesheya u-Dorsey & Whitney, uqaphele ukuba "Njengenkundla ePhakamileyo, i-Federal Circuit iyalile ukuyalela inkundla yamatyala misela ngqo ukuba yintoni 'inqaku lokwenziwa' ilungele naliphi na ityala. Lo mbuzo ngoku uzakudluliselwa kwinkundla yokuqala ukuba ihlawulwe. "
Ekugqibeleni, ingxaki kukuba ingaba i-Samsung kufuneka ihlawule umonakalo ngokusekwe kwintengiso yezixhobo iyonke yokophula amalungelo awodwa omenzi wechiza ka-Apple, isixa-mali esinokuba sikhulu kakhulu kunomonakalo osekwe kuphela kumalungu esixhobo. Ngokusengqiqweni, iApple ibheja kukhetho lokuqala, ngelixa iphikisana ukuba kangangeminyaka emihlanu, iSamsung ayibonelelanga ubungqina obukholisayo obuphikisa uluvo lwayo "kwinqaku lokwenziwa."
Ngo-2012, ijaji yaseCalifornia yanika u-Apple uloyiso, eyinika ngaphezulu kwe-548 yezigidigidi kumonakalo. Kodwa kamva, ityala elitsha kunye nokuphononongwa okumbalwa kwezomthetho kunciphise esi sixa saya kwi-XNUMX yezigidi zeedola ukuba Samsung wavuma ukuhlawula e 2015.
Kuza kwenzeka ntoni ngoku?
U-Case Collard uphawula ukuba "Iinkundla zamatyala zilulungele olu hlobo lohlalutyo, ke iyavakala into yokuba i-Federal Circuit, endaweni yokudala inkqubo [entsha], ifuna ukubona ukuba inkundla yetyala iyisombulula njani ingxaki.".
Ujaji Koh unakho, umzekelo, ukuseka konakalisa ukubuyela kwakhona ukuseka uvavanyo lokuchonga into oyenzileyo, emva koko usebenzise loo mthetho kumthetho ka-Apple.
Ababukeli benkundla ngoku bazakujongisa kwiJaji uKoh ukubona ukuba uyagqiba ekubeni abambe ityala elitsha lomonakalo ngenxa yezigqibo, utshilo uCollard.