Umthetho Wesiqinisekiso uhluke kakhulu (noma kakhulu) kuye ngezwe lapho siwuthenga khona umkhiqizo. Ngokwesibonelo E-United States of America, inkampani yaseCupertino izivumela ukunethezeka kokunikeza unyaka owodwa kuphela wewaranti kepha ... ngabe kunjalo yonke indawo? Iqiniso lihluke kakhulu.
Futhi ngukuthi uma abaseYurophu "bezuza" ngewaranti yeminyaka emibili kumadivayisi we-Apple, sithola ukuthi abantu baseNew Zealand kanye nabase-Australia bazovukela onyakeni owodwa owengeziwe. Le ndlela i-Apple ayikho enye indlela ngaphandle kokunikela ngemithetho yokuvikela abathengi yendawo ngayinye lapho ikhetha ukuthengisa khona.
Umthetho ohlanganisa la magama e-Australia naseNew Zealand ufinyelele ekuthumeni kwe-Apple, kepha siyakhumbula ukuthi ngeke ube nemiphumela yokuphinda usebenze kunoma yikuphi, okungukuthi, akuyona yonke imikhiqizo ethengiwe ezojabulela le waranti yezinyanga ezingama-36, Esikhundleni salokho, le nzuzo inikezwa kuphela kumikhiqizo ebithengiwe kusukela izolo, Disemba 13. Futhi ngukuthi mhlawumbe i-European Union kufanele inake intengo yalolu hlobo lomkhiqizo ukubheka ukwanda kweminyaka emithathu kwesiqinisekiso samanje somthetho. Kuyiqiniso ukuthi lezi zinyathelo zingakudikibalisa ukusetshenziswa, kepha ngokungangabazeki zingenza ukukhiqizwa kube okusimeme ngokwengeziwe.
Ngaphandle kokuthi imikhiqizo ye-Apple ibilokhu ijabulela idumela elihle uma kukhulunywa ngokuqina (ngingawafakazela ama-Mac, kepha hhayi ukusho okufanayo ngama-iPhones), iqiniso ukuthi muva nje ibibandakanyekile ochungechungeni lwamahemuhemu mayelana kuhlelwe futhi kwaphela ngenkani ukuthi amatheminali afana ne-iPhone 6s ahlupheka. Yiba ngangokunokwenzeka, Isiqinisekiso seminyaka emithathu sinoshukela okwenza kungabi namuntu omunyu ngokuphelele, mhlawumbe singabheka kude kakhulu e-Australia bese senza isibonelo salesi silinganiso esidumile.