Was it a mistake on Apple's part not to launch iMessages for Android?

android-imessages-launch

We are hungover from WWDC16, some of us are testing all the caches of iOS 10 yet and we do not stop finding news. However, one of the applications that gained a high profile during WWDC16 was iMessages. Apple's instant messaging service has undergone a major renovation, which allows it to get hold of the new features that we can find in the rest of the leading applications. With this, Apple intends to popularize iMessages, at least within its niche of users, but Was it a mistake on Apple's part not to launch iMessages for Android? We are going to analyze with a critical point of view, through this opinion article, Apple's latest move.

What may or may not happen in the future, we are not going to weigh it, but Tim Cook welcomed a new iMessages, a much more versatile, more open application, with its own accessories store and totally open to third-party developers. However, confusing information had been rumored for many days, in effect, everything indicated that iMessages, like Apple Music, would not be locked up in iOS jail, would become a multi-platform and multi-device application, at the height of Telegram or WhatsApp. However, we were all somewhat stunned when we observed that the presentation of this new iMessages concluded without talking about its expansion to other operating systems.

iMensajes has its own dominant audience, in the USA it is a standard among iOS users. However, it is not difficult to find iOS users in Spain or Italy who not only do not have iMessages activated, but are also unaware that it is an instant messaging service that works through the mobile data network, such as WhatsApp. Perhaps this has been the reason why Apple has wanted to put it at the level of the others. However, it remains limited by the number of iOS users. We are going to go on to expose a series of reasons why, I think it was a mistake not to launch iMessages for Android.

It will never be great if it does not reach Android

Reactions to Messages in iOS 10

  • A highly limited user niche: Whether or not the iPhone is the best-selling mobile device on the market makes no sense in this equation. We find that in countries like Spain the iOS market share is limited to just 5% of the population, and in others like Italy three quarters of the same. We are in a world of global applications, anyone, regardless of their device, has WhatsApp or Telegram, as well as other types of applications, which is, in short, the true multiplatform. Apple, with iMessages, has a multiplatform, it is true that we can use iMessages on macOS, on iOS, on watchOS and on tvOS, however, the product barrier with the silk-screened apple is still latent, and in a messaging application, it is important to be able to communicate with anyone, wherever they are, and use the device they use.
  • He's tremendously late: I do not want to bore you with the classic debate between WhatsApp and Telegram, logic and reason tell us that Telegram is the best application in all areas, however, WhatsApp has a niche of users who are not willing to abandon it, all due to that WhatsApp was the first great instant messaging application, through a mobile data network, that was truly multiplatform, and could communicate with people. In this case, iMessages is not only late, but also has another stone in its path, the stone of being an Apple product, which automatically generates controversies. However, after not offering its platform to the Google Play Store, it is delaying this announced failure even further.
  • Competition on Android is tougher (still): Those of us who use iOS and macOS devices know it, both iMessages and iCloud cannot boast of not suffering drops or of being the fastest network services, something that many users are not willing to go through is obviously the fall of the service almost monthly, which precedes Apple's network.

We also want to know your opinion, so make the most of the comment box, tell us what you think about iMessages still not reaching Android.


Follow us on Google News

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: AB Internet Networks 2008 SL
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   danielfsn said

    In my opinion, for everyone to start using more iMessages it is necessary to separate it from the SMS on the iPhone that has its own separate application, I am from Venezuela and here the majority of the population that uses iOS does not use iMessages, because they do not know it or because they just don't have many people using it.

    The changes implemented in iOS 10 are good and eye-catching, but they will only make the curious like me, use iMessages for a week or two to test it and then be forgotten again.

    Greetings.

  2.   Alejandro said

    danielfsn: The same application 'Messages' detects if the number you want to send a message is associated with an Apple ID. The name of the recipient will automatically appear in blue (iMessage) if it is registered, otherwise, it will remain in green, that is (SMS).

    I do not understand why you say to separate the two technologies ... an application for each service? I don't think I will be very useful.

    As for Android compatibility ...
    I do not understand because?
    The iMessage is exclusive to the iPhone. Nobody needs iMessage in an Android photo, for that, there is the iPhone, period.

  3.   JFPB said

    Think about what happened with BBM (BlackBerry Messenger), it was exclusively for BlackBerry and it was the best for its time and because of the security that their messages had corroborated worldwide and compared to iMessege and Telegram ...

    When BlackBerry was moribumba I released BlackBerry Messenger on all devices (Android, Microsoft, iOS) ... Which makes you wonder why can't there be the possibility that it will be launched on other devices so that it will be exclusive to iOS in the future?

  4.   Do it said

    with my family (parents, brothers, cousins, nephews) is who I use iMessage with (iPhone and iPad), I do not use any other instant messaging platform, they do use WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and / or others, but with the ones I use I communicate is iMessage, I do not think it is a bad idea to always stay on iOS, it does not ask for anything from any other messaging app as it is now, besides that it is fully integrated into the system, when I handle Siri it reads them or me them send, (I know that soon that will be for any app thanks to Apple releasing the API), but if there is something naturally integrated into the system that is invisible, it is simply great, so being an app that is installed would not be a good idea , and I do not think it is a problem to expand, on their own platforms.
    It does not need more followers, it just needs it to be better known by Apple users themselves.

  5.   Pablo said

    So I have to know which of my contacts have an iPhone to be able to send them a message, otherwise I will send a paid SMS? And if I use WhatsApp, my user base is total, I don't have to worry about that. There is no point in using imessage unless you only write to 4 people who you already know if they have IOS (margiiiiii).
    I write messages to different people every day and I don't want to know what mobile they have. this app doesn't make sense out of use. And of course, it is not something that motivates me to buy an iPhone. Other things yes, this is no joke.