What if all applications were as well developed as Telegram?

We are already closer to 2018 than to 2017, the batteries of mobile phones have been optimized to exhaustion in the case of lithium ions, we have fast charging and mobile data rates grow every six months, to the point that 4GB is an average rate of the most requested operator in Spain. However, we continue to encounter the same problems we had in 2010, the battery lasts less and less and mobile data rates literally fly.

If with each new iPhone the Cupertino company offers us more hours of autonomy and promises us a better use of our mobile data ... Why do they continue to last me so little? It is easy, while the manufacturers put the batteries to please their users, the software developers rub their hands. That is why I wonder what would happen if all the applications were as well developed as Telegram.

For many reasons in Actualidad iPhone We have positioned ourselves on more than one occasion in favor of Telegram, which is in objective terms the best instant messaging application. Its development has remained pristine since the day of its launch, an optimization of the user interface, battery performance and a host of functions that no other is capable of offering.

Meanwhile we meet a significant number of applications in the App Store that wreak real havoc with our batteries, or real havoc on our mobile rates, but be careful because on more than one occasion we are going to find applications that will wreak havoc with both sections despite the fact that the use we give does not correspond to the consumption they produce. Meanwhile, users choose to resign themselves and put aside applications with an extremely impeccable development such as Telegram, in favor of true aberrations such as WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger.

Facebook Inc, our dependence is your virtue

Meanwhile, good old Mark Zuckerberg has several applications in the App Store that offer a number of different services in the field of social networks and instant messaging such as Instagram, Facebook, FB Messenger and WhatsApp. While all of them suffer from the same problems: most of their functions are poorly integrated; They do not give you the choice to prioritize some functions over others and the subject that really concerns us, they represent an absolute drain on the consumption of mobile data and the battery of the device.

A few weeks ago I offered an analysis of the real result of uninstalling the Facebook mobile application on our iPhone, and it is not the first time that people have talked and worked on this same topic, so much so that Facebook has its "Lite" version (nonexistent on iOS) for Android that is slightly optimized to save on both sections. But it is easy to find in the "top" of battery consumption in our mobile device each and every one of the applications developed by Facebook Inc but ... To what extent are the applications that we use the most?

In this case, most of the editors of Actualidad iPhone We make interesting use of Telegram, more specifically I am totally sure that I use it more constantly than WhatsApp. However, we find very important differences in mobile data and battery consumption for two applications that supposedly have a similar purpose, more specifically In Telegram we find a much larger cast of functionalityIn this case, regardless of the "Status" that have been a real failure that Facebook is not capable of assuming and for which the company does not allow us to choose whether or not we want to have this functionality activated on our device. In short, we are quite clear that if all the applications had a more complete development behind them, as in the case of Telegram, we would all have mobile devices with more autonomy, better performance and we would save on mobile rates, something that the large companies of the software doesn't seem to worry.