The Guarantee Law is significantly (or very) different depending on the country in which we purchase the product. For example In the United States of America, the Cupertino company allows itself the luxury of offering only one year of warranty but ... is it like that everywhere? The reality is quite different.
And is that if Europeans "benefit" from a two-year warranty on Apple devices, we find that New Zealanders and Australians are going to get up to one extra year. This is how Apple has no choice but to give in to the consumer protection laws of each place where it chooses to sell.
The Law that covers these terms in Australia and New Zealand has reached Apple's dispatches, but we remember that it will not have retroactive effects in any case, that is, not all products that have been purchased will enjoy these 36 months warranty, Rather, this benefit is granted only to products that have been purchased as of yesterday, December 13. And is that perhaps the European Union should take into account the price of this type of product to consider a possible three-year extension of the current legal guarantee. It is true that these measures could discourage consumption, but they would undoubtedly make production more sustainable.
Despite the fact that Apple products have always enjoyed a good reputation when it comes to durability (I can attest to Macs, but not say the same about iPhones), the reality is that lately it has been involved in a series of rumors about the planned and totally forced obsolescence that terminals like the iPhone 6s are suffering. Be that as it may, three years warranty is a sweet that absolutely does not sour anyone, perhaps we could take a very distant look at Australia and take an example of this popular measure.