Supposed components of the iPhone 7 and they continue to appear from China. On this occasion, the Digi.tech.qq.com medium has published images of the battery that is believed to be used in the iPhone 7. The battery in the following image is from 7.04W / h, which puts it very slightly above the one used in the iPhone 6 (7.01W / h). We remember that the iPhone 6s saw its battery go down (6.61W / h), probably to make room for the 3D Touch screen. The voltage is not seen, so its exact capacity cannot be known, but it is most likely the same as that of the iPhone 6 (1810mAh for the normal and 2915mAh for the Plus model).
According to rumors, the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus 7 (and perhaps iPhone 7 Pro) will be thinner than iPhone 6, something made possible by the elimination of the 3.5mm headphone port. In the space that this connector occupied, they can also add new hardware, such as the Smart Connector that the iPad Pro currently uses or, letting the imagination run wild, a system to charge the iPhone without cables.
Is this the iPhone 7 battery?
We are still about six months away from the introduction of the iPhone 7, but we have already seen many alleged components of the device, such as the module of its dual camera, the case and even an image in which we see an iPhone without Touch ID, but the latter has little chance of becoming real, at least in 2016.
According to rumors, the iPhone 7 will be the first to not include the 3.5mm port, one of the most controversial changes in recent years. Inside will be the A10 processor, which is expected to be made entirely by TSMC and built on a 10nm process, 4GB RAM and according to the latest rumors there will be a 256GB model. If the last point is met, will 16GB continue as the entry model?
I think that more than thin we all want more battery, don't the gurus and thinkers of these companies know that? I am nobody I have it clear, more battery = total success !!!
I've said it many times already, NOBODY has asked for a slimmer iPhone, NOBODY; what we ALL asked for was more battery. Well, it turns out that they give us a thinner iPhone but with the same battery. Of course, eliminating the jack so that we can only use their Lightning helmets (which for something Apple has spent a million to buy precisely a company that manufactures helmets) or that we have to carry an adapter to use all kinds of helmets.
I will keep repeating it, this is nothing more than a gross scam, they are kidding you, this is not an innovation, it is a scam to try to get more money with their helmets because they know perfectly well that in the end few will be the ones who carry that adapter . And if you go on a trip and you forget your usual helmets where you have the adapter punctured (if it comes in the package that being Apple I sincerely doubt it) ??? What do you do? Because it is very sure that the adapter will bring the famous recognition chip, and those of the Chinese will work badly or directly or will not work.
I am very funny about the argument that some use that "someone had to do it and that someone is always Apple", do what? Take away what is perhaps the most universal connector to listen to music / videos privately in history? Is innovation to eliminate at a stroke the fact of being able to connect millions of headphone models to be able to use only the ones they sell?
Then there is the other argument that others even less informed use ... Bluetooth headphones. But pitcher souls that Bluetooth headphones have been used practically forever by God, forever. I have been able to use Bluetooth headphones from my iPhone 4 to my iPhone 6 (which by the way I have already given it to a relative).
As I say, this is just another scam by Apple to line its pockets at our expense. This type of practice started with the iPad 3, then with the iPhone 5c, which was already a real shame, and now this has been the last straw for me, forcing me to leave Apple fed up with being teased.
Come on!!! Future buyers of the iPhone 7 already have it, an ultra-thin device (which as I say is something that people were crying out for), with the same battery as the iPhone 6, and without the most universal port in history to listen to. music / videos privately. I just bought the S7 Edge with, of course, a 3.5mm jack and a battery of nothing more and nothing less than 3600mAh. Eye! I have not been so many years with Apple to become an Android Taliban (in fact I have never been a Taliban of anything, neither before Apple nor Android now) but we must admit that this new S7 Edge is definitely incredible.
4GB of RAM 32 Nuclei and a black one that gives you a blowjob. Anyway, every day this blog makes me laugh more
to keep it the same thickness, would we have 30% more battery?
Alfonso R I agree Samsung has come to release Post Apple designs, but well, unless it is happening internally within the block, MS surpasses in sales compared to the ipad / air / pro range, when sales of the new iphone drop, the central pillar that the company maintains, only if that happens, those who win are the users, we will have better optimized quality software, products at the level of competition, etc ...
If this is true .. iPhone 7 equal to the same resolution .. I do not understand anything! We all want more battery, but the resolution of the iPhone 6s is not enough .. Maybe they get a screen with more colors, although I doubt it! But I would love a much better screen than the current one, but it means more consumption and with the same battery ... They are laughing at us, I assure you! Apple must get a much better battery than the current one and that lasts with intensive use .. At least one day, currently it can last 5 hours of use
It seems that Apple likes that its customers are with the charger in hand, right?
Since Tim Cook joined Apple he has gone backwards, I am a Mac and iPad user but I left the iPhone aside for many reasons for these discomforts, I do not want an ultra thin phone with large frames that even a Galaxy S4 has a larger screen with less dimensions, this nobody sees it in cupertino? fuck!
every day I have realized, that apple works hard for a beautiful and beautiful design as the best, but not usable in all aspects.
Look, they threw out the designer of the Galaxy S5 that was horrible! and they released the S6 with the new designer ... the phone must be confessed that it is nice coming from Samsung ,,,, because you do not do that with Apple.
Anyway, everyone who sees it in their own way, but the benefits of an iPhone now only focus on an iOS and exterior design ... the inside as the battery screen does not change it or GOD!
But do you know who the designer of Apple is? Nothing more and nothing less than Jony Ive partner, throwing this man out on the street is something unthinkable. When Scott Forstall (Jobs' right-hand man and responsible for iOS up to iOS 6) he was fired outright with Maps, as was the case of the Samsung designer you mention. When Ive screwed up with the Bendgate of the iPhone 6 not only was not fired, but Apple blamed the brittleness of the aluminum used in the construction of the iPhone 6 was, touch your balls, of the users. In other words, a software failure that is corrected with a simple patch is much more important than a hardware failure that is only corrected by changing the material (as was done in the 6s) of construction of the phone.
Fellow, Jony Ive was also appointed after the dismissal of Forstall, head of iOS design and he brought us for example the wonderful icons of iOS 7, with those shadows, textures, etc, and we were all in awe of the work that the preschool children of the Cupertino employees designing those icons with the famous Paint application.
When Cook was promoted to Jobs 'position, he only dedicated himself to dynamiting and destroying all of Jobs' work and work. He got rid of the latter's closest collaborators (Forstall), and stayed with his own (Ive), to complete his work.
I suppose that someday people will realize (I have already given it after many years with Apple and that is why I have gone to the competition) that they are being taken for a ride, that in fact, before, less hardware power did not have nothing to do with phone performance, and it was so true that with less hardware the iPhone moved EVERYTHING much better than any phone with four times more power; but now not even that; You only have to see the complaints of lageos and other stories that from iOS 7 began to appear all over the world, iOS 9 in this takes the cake but apparently even in the 6s.
The bad thing is that Jobs no longer exists and is someone unrepeatable, that is, there is no other Jobs that Apple can lift if it falls, which will fall at the rate it goes.
What are they complaining about? They do not like it. Simolemente do not buy it and now. It's that simple and there will be more people who like it. Everyone is free to choose what to buy. Or do I put a gun to you to buy apple products? I am not. Apple fanatic but one thing is clear. If you don't like it and you think they are taking money from you. Just don't buy their products and voila. Why so much drama?