Although it has eight cores (to be said soon) and a screen with a scandal resolution, Samsung's new Galaxy S6 once again proves that only on paper it is the best. Samsung's new flagship falls sharply in GPU management of applications and games when compared to the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus (even the iPhone 5S). Therefore, the iPhone 6 demonstrates better graphics performance than the Galaxy S6.
Paper and more paper
In its particular war of specifications SAmsung offers incredible resolutions, with an endless number of cores, RAM and raw power that once again we see that it goes down the drain when push comes to shove. In the case of the iPhone with its iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus models, they have shown a much less noticeable FPS drop than that of the Galaxy S6 when it comes to representing OpenGL ES 3.0 or 3D content, falling in the case of the Samsung Galaxy S6 to A ridiculous 15fps and remained in the iPhone cases between 24,4 and 19,2fps.
In other words, the performance of the Samsung Galaxy S6 considering its hardware could theoretically match that of the iPhones if they were not busy working to give movement to a huge number of additional pixels that contribute little to nothing to the benefit of the experience. of user. Think as if we were talking about vehicles, it would be like trying to move a car, with an incredibly powerful engine but with square wheels. Samsung is already a veteran in selling numbers.
64 bits and Exynos
Samsung is focusing on producing its own Exynos processors to stop investing in Qualcomm Snapdragon and keep everything at home, but the war is getting out of hand. Even from Qualcomm they pointed out that in its launch to 64 bits "Apple had kicked everyone in the balls, causing panic in the industry."
Metal, the key
Metal API is a superior performance alternative to the standard, and it is more than proven, to make computing on a GPU more efficient than OpenGL ES and OpenCL. On the other hand, Samsung has not settled on a single family of processors for this purpose or even a single GPU architecture. These are the reasons why Metal is unrivaled.
With the use of Metal, developers can achieve more detailed animations and better processing speeds on the same hardware, hence many games have been adapted from their old version to the current one after the arrival of iOS 8, hence the iPhone 6 Plus, in the case of games, almost double in performance its direct rival such as the Samsung Galaxy Note IV, stabilizing a resolution that the Note is not capable of maintaining.
Conclusion
Once again, the Cupertino people take the optimization work to the maximum, the details are what distinguish the good products from the best. Samsung is undoubtedly a very serious company, and some of its devices do not have direct competition within Android such as the Galaxy Note VI, but as we have already said, once again Apple proves to do more with less, showing that number marketing is not what it seemsAlthough there will always be those who prefer a large donkey, whether it walks or not. For me, the most surprising thing about these statistics is seeing the incredible brands of the iPhone 5S that you can face the great Galaxy S6 without fear which shows the work behind it.
Fuck! I read you and, sometimes, I think that in some of your articles you can see the feather duster. You are good, but defending Apple "blindly" is not a good thing. About this article, just say that the FPS is impossible to be even similar when the Samsung has to move almost three times the resolution of the iPhone6.
really the problem is that moving more resolution costs more at the same graphic power. It is clear that the Galaxy S6 has greater graphic power than the iPhone 6 (you only have to read the result when both work at the same resolution of 1080p). The thing is, I still don't understand the resolution or pixel density race. those resolutions on those screens are ridiculous. above 350-400 dpi it is only wasting graphic power and consuming more battery….
The iPhone 6 Plus renders at 1242 x 2208 pixels and then resizes to Full HD. For practical purposes, it is as if your screen had that resolution so it is not so much the difference that there is with the S6. Greetings!
Nehemiah Valentin Vega
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
So that both cores and RAM memory !! Have if Samsung learns from Apple. When Apple releases the iPhone 6s or the iPhone 7, with two gigabytes of Ram, what a fabric… I very much agree with the article !!
The iphone moves maximum 1080
The s6 resolution 2K
I think there is no more to say
fucking samsunñeros then then they take it out saying there is that the galaxy s6 has 2k and it tries harder, my little eggs the gpu of the iPhone 6 eats the wing of the galaxy s6 and in individual processors the Apple processors are more powerful and I deserve the processor in Individual if you don't understand, go study burritos.
With that spelling, it is not that I have to study to understand you, it is that you should learn to write to explain yourself. Cheers to your eggs.
I am an iPhone user since the 4S and an Android user since the Galaxy S3, and my iPhone 4S gave the Galaxy S3 a thousand kicks in usability, games, multimedia capacity and more. The games in the Galaxy lagged, its interface fluidity the same, there were more opportunities in which it was delayed until entering the main screen or leaving it. And the Galaxy S3 was supposed to have twice as much hardware on paper. 1 Gb of Ram instead of 512, 4 cores instead of two Etc. In the most demanding games the S3 overheated to uncomfortable levels while the iPhone was cool in comparison. I thought it was a phone problem so I tried another one from a friend and the same. We even respect both phones to leave them from the factory and install applications and test them and the same in both ...
In the end I said ok point to Apple. then I went from 4S to 5C and from S3 to S4 and the same antics, My iPhone 5C MISIO handled like playing WITHOUT PROBLEMS and the S4 that was supposed to be MUCH MORE MODERN got slow over time and overheated more than the S3. The games that were supposed to be old like the N4S Most Wanted and should run smoothly on the S4, it had as many lags as the S3, while NONE on the iPhone. I'm bored with Samsung and I went to HTC, to the M8 and here things improved a lot, although the Lags were not eliminated, they were much less frequent and less embarrassing BUT BECAUSE I HAD A MUCH MORE POWERFUL PROCESSOR AND HOWEVER MY iPHONE (WITH FALLS , WET AND BURIED IN SEA SAND) HE WAS CALM.
Now I have a 6 Gb iPhone 128 Plus, I am more than happy to have it, and even more so because its battery lasts me the whole day without the need for additional charging. and I squeeze it quite a bit. In truth, no Android is a match for performance for the Manzanita. There are only 2 things I miss about using Android, sharing any type of file and SMS Shady.
They are magnified by figures, that does not mean that it has better graphic performance. For God's sake this apple is making us blind !!
To Mr. Rafael Pazos, good morning, it is true that Android has much more powerful hardware, but they charge us for it and we do not carry it, that if it has fabric… .. How much does this tune of optimization cost? 500 euros…. By the way, optimization was lost with IOS 7
This is as if Samsung made 7700cc racing cars but with square wheels. Without sense. 😆😆
Well, my iPhone has everything except optimization ... I would like to see a battery comparison because I think they have put a button on mine ...
That does not prove anything, the S6 has a QHD screen and the Iphone 6 and 6 plus do not even arrive full hd, the performance in the # may be greater help than this, consuming less resources thanks to IOS 8 but that does not mean there is lag 4s or 5.
obvious
You have to consider something, the resolution of the apple screen is much lower than the QHD screen of the S6.
More graphic resources are required to move the screen of the S6 compared to the 6.
To begin with, Samsung did not even change the model «supemoled» quite expensive if they get damaged, the screen of the iPhone 6 (only the plus) is psi ultra retina technology 😉 trout bro 1920 × 1080 per inch
No other type of backlighting has come out better than amoled.
The S6 has Gorilla Glass 4, which is very resistant and in case of damage, all screen repairs are expensive.
Just so you keep in mind and don't talk nonsense, the S6 has a resolution of Four times HD (1440 × 2560) at 577 ppi and the iPhone 6 Plus at full hd (1920 × 1080) with 401 ppi.
And there goes your Retinas screens, that's why maybe it has higher fps, if your screens run at low ppi.
-IPhone 4 and 4S: 330 ppi
-IPhone 5,5c and 5S: 326 ppi
-iPhone 6: 326ppi
-iPhone 6+: 401ppi
I think that you should never compare an iPhone with a galaxy, because it is not illogical, first the iPhone is dual core and I think that is 2 cores and the galaxy 8 cores, second the galaxy has 3GB of ram and the iPhone only 1GB, To be fair should the iPhone 6 be compared to the Galaxy S3 which in some versions is dual core and 1 GB of ram, that would be a fair comparison!
PURE PENDEJADAS YOU SAY MORE CORES DOES NOT MEAN MORE POWER DONKEY
Apple no longer knows what to do for what is expected with the S6 with a 14 nm processor is brutal
This page has a regular article for every 9 pitiful. This is a disgrace. Only jailbreak articles are worth it. The rest is rubbish written by mediocre ternagers and without criteria.
Good afternoon Flippo. I myself, who have written this article backed by objective figures, am the one in charge of most articles about Jailbreak. Nothing more than to thank you that you like our articles.
Greetings and thank you.
This page is riddled with detractors of Apple, who come to troll from time to time. They should not be in an android forum commenting on the exploits of the galaxy 6? Proud of the Samsung screen, can anyone tell me how you use that super screen?
If you continue defending the article I think that either you have not read the data of the comparison or you have a comprehension problem ...
The graph only shows OpenGL3.0 and 2.0 data using THE MAXIMUM RESOLUTION OF THE DEVICE.
If you look at the data for the same resolution at 1080P, it says Galaxy S6 1.478, Iphone6 1.149 and 6+ 1.177.
I am not saying that there are no fanboys and it is debatable what user experience, aesthetics, etc. it is better, but this is not opinionable data ...
WHICH SUPER SCREEN ALREADY SAW IT AND IT LOOKS THE SAME AS THE IPHONE 6 PURE BLOWJOBS SAY ABOUT SAMSUNG THE BETTER YOU GET TO MAKE TELEVISIONS.
Take it Toño Anieva
Without a doubt there is no better mobile than the iPhone
I have read the article and this is my conclusion:
What good is it to me that a 5-inch mobile has a 4k resolution? If until recently it was said that the FullHD in televisions less than 40 inches was a waste of money!
I have an iphone 6 and I prefer that it render at a lower resolution (they are still 326dpi), but go FLUID. If internally it has 2,8 or 100 cores, I don't care (ditto with RAM).
I bought a very expensive mobile not because of the hardware, but because of the user experience. If Apple gives me the same experience with less hardware, what else does it give me! I just want it to go fast within a minimum of quality (resolution, finishes, connectivity, photographic quality, applications, etc).
I already know that a Subaru Impreza WRX runs more than a 330i, but if I don't put it on the track, the BMW "spreads" more.
PS: I am a Forocochero! XD
Who knows but the galaxy is prettier and its screen looks much better and I'm writing this from an iPhone 6, I'm 6 years old with iPhone and it's always the same only with more colors it's ios
THEN HOW DO THEY EXPLAIN THAT IN GRAPHIC PERFORMANCE THAT THE IPHONE 5S IS FASTER THAN THE IPHONE 6. I HER THEY BACKED UP, ???????? LOL.
the answer is simple. THE RESOLUTION OF THE SCREEN.
What a novelty !!! to the iPhone there is no cell phone that surpasses it
I can't stop laughing at your last lines. When you stop being a fanboy, you start making smartphone comparisons. the better he exchanges information with the holy walrus
This page is from apple so they defend their overrated garbage they burn the more than 20 million orders of the s6 before they are sold samsung is better and remember that samsung will manufacture its A9 processor
Because the worshipers of the trout god Android do not go to their forums and leave us iPhone users alone, we like to talk about our phones and the tremendous amount of hardware that you do not need to be the best. Not to mention that we always have the updated iOS, not like others, which above have so many versions made by different brands and even people that many times are not compatible. My family and I arrived at the gala and notice, from there we passed Windows Phones after two months we were all with iPhone 5 and now 6+. They have no competition, so much so that even Windows 8 Pro Media desktops and notebooks throughout the home and office have changed, right down to Wi-Fi. At least, so far both iOS and OSX have no serious competition.
APPLE ALWAYS ABOVE THE CURRENT BRAND OF SAMSUNG, APPLE DOES MORE WITH LESS IT DOES NOT REQUIRE SO MUCH CORE, SO MUCH RAM RESOLUTIONS TO THE 4K SLOPE OR LITTLE CURBED BOOBS SCREENS SO PUT YOUR GALAXY S6, S7, S8, S9 IN
I am an iPhone user since the 4S and an Android user since the Galaxy S3, and my iPhone 4S gave the Galaxy S3 a thousand kicks in usability, games, multimedia capacity and more. The games in the Galaxy lagged, its interface fluidity the same, there were more opportunities in which it was delayed until entering the main screen or leaving it. And the Galaxy S3 was supposed to have twice as much hardware on paper. 1 Gb of Ram instead of 512, 4 cores instead of two Etc. In the most demanding games the S3 overheated to uncomfortable levels while the iPhone was cool in comparison. I thought it was a phone problem so I tried another one from a friend and the same. We even respect both phones to leave them from the factory and install applications and test them and the same in both ...
In the end I said ok point to Apple. then I went from 4S to 5C and from S3 to S4 and the same antics, My iPhone 5C MISIO handled like playing WITHOUT PROBLEMS and the S4 that was supposed to be MUCH MORE MODERN got slow over time and overheated more than the S3. The games that were supposed to be old like the N4S Most Wanted and should run smoothly on the S4, it had as many lags as the S3, while NONE on the iPhone. I'm bored with Samsung and I went to HTC, to the M8 and here things improved a lot, although the Lags were not eliminated, they were much less frequent and less embarrassing BUT BECAUSE I HAD A MUCH MORE POWERFUL PROCESSOR AND HOWEVER MY iPHONE (WITH FALLS , WET AND BURIED IN SEA SAND) HE WAS STILL CALM.
Now I have a 6 Gb iPhone 128 Plus, I am more than happy to have it, and even more so because its battery lasts me the whole day without the need for additional charging. and I squeeze it quite a bit. In truth, no Android is a match for performance for the Manzanita. There are only 2 things I miss about using Android, sharing any type of file and SMS Shady.