One of the first, if not the first, tests done on any new device is to measure its performance in benchmarks. The figures obtained in this type of tests are not definitive, since a device can obtain a great result in Geekbench 3, which is the most used application for this type of test, and then have problems in daily use, but it does they show us more or less how a device can work.
As you all know, the iPhone 6s and the iPhone 6s Plus are available for purchase in the first countries from today and the first tests have already been done with Geekbench 3 to obtain the benchmarks of the latest smartphone launched by the company run by Tim Cook. On paper, the A9, which is a processor dual-core, it should get much lower results than other competing devices, but will this be the case this time?
The iPhone 6s has scored 2529 in the single-core test and 4375 in the multi-core test. It is more than a 30% higher than iPhone 6, a device that came out now a year ago. But, if we compare it with the Galaxy Note 5, which we remember was launched only a couple of weeks before the iPhone 6s, the new smartphone of the bitten apple. sweeps the Note 5 by far in the single-core test and it is on par in the multi-core test, despite the fact that Samsung's phablet has an eight-core processor. 
In the 3DMark test, which is responsible for measuring the GPU performanceWe also see how the iPhone 6s is above the Note 5, this time with a wider margin. 
The comparisons are obnoxious and many of the following devices have been on the market for several months now, but they are comparisons that have to be made as they are the devices that are now available. In the following list you can see more benchmarks:
Have you got the worst result of the Note5? it can give +5000 in multicore, but of course, it doesn't matter ... You only show the singlecore results, which is what matters. Everyone knows that Apple's cores are better than Android's (putting fewer cores helps them improve the few they have), on Android between 4 and 8 cores are used, and many give higher scores than the iPhone 6S. Sticking with the singlecore score is very unbiased ...
Did you read the article? If you mention the multicore where they are equaled when shamesung uses four cores and Apple only two, this whole issue of power is due to the operating system and the layers that shamesung uses on android so they need more power and battery, collect all your data all time is not free, in the end everything is based on the difference between effectiveness and efficiency.
mentions the multicore only once, and with misinformation, the Note5's score is NOT REAL, that's hoax.
Samsung has changed in recent months and has greatly improved its layer, of course if you like exaggerated and old topics, then yes, you are right.
As I said, in Apple's SoC, having fewer cores can squeeze more, on the other hand, other SoC's have more cores and the single-core performance cannot be squeezed so much, but the important one, the GLOBAL performance, the multi-core , It is NOT far superior. I refer you to my first sentence that you may not have read, the one I said that gives +5000 points in multi-core? well that.
Also look at the little knowledge you have, the misinformation and ignorance that surrounds you, that the Exynos 7420 you are talking about is not QuadCore, it is OctaCore, there you have a whoosh in all your mouth 😉
And speaking of effectiveness, do you want to talk about effectiveness? really? go for it:
The Note5 with its 5.7 ″ and 2K resolution, has an average screen consumption of 0.95W. While the iPhone6 with its 4.7 ″ and HD + resolution, almost 4 times less and 1 inch less, consumes an average of 1.07W, and if we talk about the iPhone6Plus the figure rises to 1.52W, did you want efficiency? here you have the other zas in all the mouth majete 😉
Ah, if you are going to answer me, answer me with data as I have done, the numbers on the screens are from displaymate, a reputed display website that does not do favors for anyone, neither Apple nor Samsung. And the REAL scores and not the ones you put here you can get from reputable websites like gsmarena.
Otherwise I will ignore you.
I did not see insults from lliansaul anywhere but on the other hand they were offended ... what a level.
Poor! The one who gets angry loses, it is incredible how they handle their anger based on whether an article is right or not. Nobody really cares about these opinions. He defends android as if he developed it and perhaps in his life he has had a premium range in his hands.
I have not been "angry", least of all because of lliandaul, the only thing that has annoyed me is that the data is falsified in the news to say something that is not.
About the phones that I have had ... since I was a child with high-end and paid for by me, not by the parents, from the 6630 or the N958GB, through Mi2S or Note3 and now ending with an EdgePlus, so again speaking from ignorance ...