Are the answers coming on iOS from Android Wear?

android wear

Recently came the news that many Pebble users were waiting, it is now possible to interact and respond to messages that we receive on our iOS device through the Pebble watch. Using these abbreviated text messages, we find the first wearable device that is not the Apple Watch and that allows us to really interact with our iOS device. Will this mark a before and after in Apple's policy regarding these types of possibilities?, It is clear that Apple had been quite resounding about it, and that is that we could do little or nothing with synchronization devices beyond reading our notifications, but this may come to an end. What do you think? Will Apple allow it with Android Wear too?

We are in a market that is becoming extremely saturated, with smart watches for all tastes, colors and sensations. Both round and square, both focused on sport and elegance, however, until now they all had the same lack with respect to an iOS device, we could not do anything beyond reading the notifications. But the arrival of the answers through the Pebble can mark a before and after in this strict policy of promoting only Apple Watch.

Without a doubt, if the Pebble can do it, we will find many Android Wear devices that at least have that capacity, regardless of whether Apple decides to allow it or not. Clocks are not a computer, nor a mobile phone. A watch is an accessory more than a tool, that is why Apple should not force us to use only its brand, this is as if Apple decided that its users can only wear Pedro del Hierro shirts, limiting the usefulness of the watch. iPhone for those who wear other types of shirts, and this is certainly not good.

FitBit-Health

Since the arrival of Tim Cook, Apple is making other decisions regarding the hermeticity of the system, and that is why we still have a halo of hope for wearable devices, because Apple cannot expect the athlete to attend a gala dinner with the watch with which they have trainedNor does it pretend that the judge appears in the courtroom with the watch that hours before he used to play golf, because a watch is just another accessory, and there are them for all occasions. That is why some will decide to use fitness bracelets to train and prefer round-screen watches to attend a gala dinner, all without giving up the possibilities that technology offers us and that Apple wants to unify through a single watch with many straps different.

What do you think? Will Apple allow it with Android Wear as well? Are interactions through Android Wear devices just around the corner? Because if there is something that Android Wear devices benefit from, it is their variety, we have really nice devices like the Motorola 360, round, metallic and inconspicuous. On the other hand, we have authentic classic-cut watches like the LG G Watch Urbane 2, and we also have devices with a rectangular but elegant cut screen like the Asus Zenwatch 2. If we focus on sports, a good fitness bracelet cannot be missing, providing much more comfort and information needed for training. The benefit of getting home, parking your bracelet, grabbing your smart watch, and introducing yourself to dinner hours later. It is something that can be a lot less fun with the Apple Watch, at least not without changing the strap.


Follow us on Google News

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

*

*

  1. Responsible for the data: AB Internet Networks 2008 SL
  2. Purpose of the data: Control SPAM, comment management.
  3. Legitimation: Your consent
  4. Communication of the data: The data will not be communicated to third parties except by legal obligation.
  5. Data storage: Database hosted by Occentus Networks (EU)
  6. Rights: At any time you can limit, recover and delete your information.

  1.   nuns said

    what nonsense article. What pebble did was team up with at & t to skip the iphone and send the sms directly from the pebble to at & t (via the pebble app). ONLY GOOD FOR AT&T and is a fudge. a hack so all the initial hypothesis on which you base the article, is wrong. Therefore, the entire article is.