It has always been said that comparisons are hateful, but we never stop or will never stop making them. The latest phone that Samsung has introduced is the Notes 7, a device with an Exynos 8890 octa-core processor and 4GB of RAM that drives a 2-inch 5.7K screen. The latest phones Apple has released are the iPhone 6s and the iPhone 6s Plus, both with A9 dual-core processor and 2GB of RAM, but the 4.7-inch model, the one they used in this comparison, has a 1.334-by-750 resolution screen.
One of the tests that are carried out as soon as you get your hands on a device that has just been released is the speed test. To do this, take two terminals and time how long it takes to open multiple apps, in some cases doing two laps, the second to check how they behave with applications open in the background. Which one will win in this race: the Galaxy Note 7 or the iPhone 6s?
Galaxy Note 7 vs. iPhone 6s
As you can see in the video, the beating is very important. As we said at the beginning of this post, comparisons are hateful and we are talking about very different devices, starting with the difference in screen size and ending with the operating system used by both terminals, being Android Marshmallow in the case of the Note 7 and iOS 9 in the case of the iPhone 6s.
The defenders of the Galaxy Note 7 say, with reason, that the terminal of the Korean giant has to get more work done, but the defenders of the iPhone 6s say, no less reason, that the important thing about a device is how it behaves in daily use and what good are so many cores, RAM and resolution if in the end they will weigh down the performance of the computer? What do you prefer?
They should wait and make the tes with iOS 10 the streaks go like lightning
iOS is always and will go faster than android, the system is much more optimized, android is brutal power without control (that if octacore at 2,4ghz and things like that and 6gb of ram) but the app and the system like that is a real garbage in optimization and is the great workhorse of android until that is not fixed iOS will always be the jewel in the crown.
Seen the video it seems to me a shame on the part of chamchun that with so many ran, nucleos etc in the second round I have to open games again and practically everything ... in short, no comments
Also a note I forgot… .. The hardware of the Note is a real beast and the iPhone a garbage but of course…. We are going to stop at the trunk of the pear tree…. IOS optimization is brutal compared to android
Okay, but first I would have to see the games open and played like the iPhone, apart from that you can't see if there are any open apps in multitasking, I hope it was, but it isn't, I expect much from IOS 10, in short, unprofessional video simply to generate fanboy visits
ufff that stinks of envy around here!
At the beginning of the video, open multitasking where you can see that it is only the settings app on both devices, then close settings on both and start with the «test»
Obviously it is not a professional test but it makes the iphone performance more than clear! that improves year by year and in android it is still stagnant although they put hardware a thousand times more powerful.
We see how the note starts faster in apps that do not require a lot of fast processing, and then when it is time to open games the iPhone overtakes it, this is pure optimization, Apple with the A9 and A8 chip gave a lot of energy to the graphic processing, and I did not I mean in power, which it is, but in performance, and I bet the A10 will be an even bigger leap. It's not being a fanboy, it's being realistic.
Envy that, if I have the iPhone 6s look at the image and you will check it
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wupa2d6wo7nmvds/image.jpeg?dl=0
this is such a bad done is a video for retarded geeks like you to make money with them, the game does not
It was open on the galaxy and on the iphone if for which in the galaxy I had to open it as a new game and it takes longer, I have tested the galaxy s7 edge with my iphone 6s and it surpasses it in everything in speed in screen quality etc. .., because this one that is new surely that also, with silly users like you it is normal that every year we continue to get the shrimp and do not improve as it will happen with the iphone 7
This is called a whoosh in the whole mouth. And I agree with you, with conformists you are not going anywhere. Apart from that the comparison must be done with the Nexus range. And not even that, because one moves screens of higher resolution than the other, essential for virtual reality, for example. Even so, for the moment I am still staying for the moment for iOS, for the system itself, despite its shortcomings, not for the hardware or the design.
The difference is when it comes to running games ... surely if there were no games involved, for example I don't have any on my iPhone, the test would be different ... the resolution of the screen makes games lose performance !! ! But for daily use with everyday Apps I am sure that the note will eat the 6S, hopefully that changes with the i7 ... but it's like everything ... to taste the colors, I prefer optimization and performance that the iPhone gives me that has a screen resolution brutal that is barely perceptible to the eye. But that each one chooses
But let's see dave you show your total ignorance, here a computer engineer, why the hell do you want a 2k screen on a mobile? The eye is not able to perceive anything else from a certain amount of pixel density. And now is when the ready comes to me and tells me resolution has nothing to do with ppi (pixel density) because yes, the more resolution, the more pixel density, that is, the number of pixels per inch. Well, in a mobile you will not be able to distinguish it no matter how hard you try, if you see better quality it is simply a placebo and marketing effect like the one that you get from X amount of cores that not 10% of the apps use them or simply Because you like amoled technology better, but believe me, it has nothing to do with resolution. They can put a 4k in a mobile if they want, that your eye will not be able to distinguish the amount of pixels per inch of a 1080 or a retina.
Required for the best smartphone experience with virtual reality glasses, for example, if you don't want to see pixels like suns. By the way, for the same reason that you expose, why do you want 4k screens on a 21-inch iMac when you won't see it from more than one meter to work with it? Anyway…
Excellent another medium that supports the super mega misinformation of the media ...
The iPhone, the iPhone important to mention that it is worthless if we talk about virtual reality. What is really cool and one time inside you forget even iOS 999
Samsung is light years ahead in virtual reality and this no longer changed or for any iOS
The iPhone screen is so bad that it is not valid for virtual reality, Samsung is moving a quality screen with a beastly proportion, to make use of this reality, as well as the battery and hardware consumption and etc. are brutal but all this alone you will discover when it begins to see beyond the iPhone.
It is like reporting that one backs up faster with a Seat than with a Ferrari …… worse than the consumption of the Seat is better… ..
What misinformation the media carries, it is not just commenting on the Samsung mobile and what you want to use for. What do you need 2k 4K for? And much more? For virtual reality
Hi, Aaa. Misinformation in a career? You can say what you want, but the video shows speed. It's like comparing the speed of a car with that of a truck: a truck can carry tons, but practically any car gets to sites faster. The Samsung can do whatever you want, like you tell me it does origami, but what this video shows it takes longer. That is not disinformation. Disinformation is talking about virtual reality when the post talks about speed.
A greeting.
Yes, the video shows speed, but in different conditions. One has to move a screen of the highest quality and resolution (hence the user alluded to VR), and the other an easier screen to move, with far fewer dots. If that's a fair comparison, we accept octopus as a pet.
I quote: «Proponents of the Galaxy Note 7 say, justly, that the terminal of the Korean giant has to do more work […] ».
Speed tests have always been done, now we have to stop doing them because a company would like to put a higher screen resolution? If the comparison is unfair, it should be just as unfair that one had dual-core and 2 of RAM and the other 4 of RAM and octa-core, that is, double the RAM and quadruple cores. Isn't that interesting to put it on the list?
The iPhone is a good but normal and well-equipped mobile phone and says a user of a 2G edge up to the 6 Plus, the note and for example the S7 is much better, starting with the operating system, hardware screen and etc.
The iPhone is fast if of course my Casio calculator is the same, you can go in and copy a file where you feel like it, right? You can't do half of what you can with Android.
And of course the jewel in the crown is no longer Android and iOS with both you can do the same, limited with iOS you will have to play more with the operating system to do things that are so simple with Android.
The jewel in the crown is virtual reality, without a doubt the ones we are testing now are the same as we had gone through the iPhone Edge, it is amazing.
I remember the iPhone Edge (2G) there was no copy and paste, and endless things, we are on the same path.
The only downside I can put down right now is the weight of the glasses and wearing the glasses (they are huge).
BUT once placed, the most important thing is the content and it is very well achieved, there is quality content and mainly what helps is that we have virtual reality porn that is to freak out, it is not watching a movie, it is being in the movie, 😛 yet I hallucinate hahahaha
I do not doubt that more than one makes the divorce.
It is very difficult to explain for those who have not tried yet but to say something for example.
We can take the 16-bit super Nintendo and the Playstation 4, we compare both and the difference is very, very little when we talk about virtual reality. It would be like saying that the Playstation 4 is the same as the 16-bit super Nintendo.
You have to prove there is no way to explain the difference there is when using virtual reality. It is being in another place but not only seeing and participating in it.
Well, porn moves mountains and this is amazing.
Do not confuse 3d with VR is something else entirely.
The brutal configuration that the Note 7 has and of course the Galaxy S7 is nothing in VR, to emulate a movie theater and watch (being in the movies is enough) but to move applications the brutal hardware of the Galaxy S7 for example is like Using a 16-bit Nintendo is not enough, moving a whole world needs a lot of hardware and as brutal as the Note 7 may seem, it is still little for VR.
The current VR is like the iPhone Edge 2G, a stranger and that everyone (on the street) missed it.
The Nokia was this and that.
Now it turns out that the amount of RAM and the number of cores are important after reading and listening a thousand times in podcasts that the important thing is quality and not quantity. Okay, I accept octopus.
«If the comparison is unfair, just as unfair Should be[...] ».
From the creators of «1 GB of RAM is enough to move the system» comes «the octa-core injustice».
And from the creators of "big horse, walk or not walk" comes "it is unfair that my horse races with others."
Ooohhh you have disabled the power to respond to you, great democrat. It is what has to run out of arguments. And don't worry, if you don't post it, I'll post it on Twitter for the whole world to see.
I have not deactivated anything. If you notice, you can't reply to your last comment either.
My arguments are more than simple:
1- Speed is speed. The post's headline includes the words "Speed Test."
2- Important: If someone says that it is unfair, I speak of another point of injustice to balance things.
3- The RAM thing is as simple as that those who have always defended that it is necessary (speaking of all those specifications), now say that it is not taken into account. As in point 2, if someone speaks of injustice, everything will have to be balanced.
PS: What will Democracy have to do with the alleged case of deactivating comments? For your information, Democracy comes from the Greek and from the words "démos" (people) and "krátos" (power or strength). A democrat is one who agrees with democracy. I don't see the "force of the people" anywhere.
You haven't posted the comment to me, huh? I don't blame you, you probably didn't know what to answer.
PS: If you're smart at least study Plutarco.
I have not deleted anything. Maybe another editor has done it because of the "well-known emoji" thing, I don't know what you expect in that case.
On the other hand, I do not have to study anything, it is a quick translation so that it is understood, such as, for example, translating the expression "kick ass" from English as "cane". I don't know which is worse, translating "give" as a people or calling someone who has done nothing a "democrat". I'm doing too much explaining, which I shouldn't after tagging the blog as "known emoji."
I have not said that about the blog (if it were so, I would simply not enter), but about the operation, according to those seen in the comments. Or do you think that the fact of needing to upload 10 comments to respond to you is due to an excellent performance?
Anyway, have a good day.
Iphone virtual reality 0 ... I don't want it or a gift.
I prefer even the galaxy S6 than an iPhone 9 without virtual reality.
There is no color between one and the other, a while ago I went from ios to android and my experience was disastrous, in less than a year I returned to IOS. I love the latest Samsung and they look like a cucumber to me but it fucks up the Android toner.
Incredible the comparison, it is seen that he has no idea what he is talking about. Shame. 100 x 100 Samsung without a doubt.