Again we come with allusions between the FBI and Apple, this film is not ending, this time James Comey has come to the fore and once again it is to contradict himself. The FBI director assumes they would use the unlocking of the iPhone involved in the San Bernardino bombings as a precedent, in fact he has outlined a "of course". Apple's greatest fear and the reason why it has resolutely denied was precisely that, the fact that they used this collaboration between the Cupertino company and the FBI as a precedent. However, we must remember that not so long ago, the FBI excused itself that it would not set a precedent and it was a unique case.
James Comey has come to the fore, he has stood in front of Congress to speak about the encryption of iOS and the problems it is causing the FBI in the case of the San Bernardino attacks. It has tried to confront the privacy that Apple imposes on its devices with the supposed national security of the State. As expected, most of the questions asked of the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation have been referring to the precedent that this would cause with future similar cases, although they are not of similar importance.
We follow the Law, and if the Law is in our favor and suits our needs, of course we will use those precedents.
This basically contradicts all the reasons that until now the FBI has used to try to convince Apple, in short, the FBI has been a cheater, it has literally deceived Apple to see if it fell into its jaws, however Tim Cook has been strong, knowing that the FBI is not as trustworthy as it seems, and it is a shame that they care more about their own battles, stepping on some citizens to imprison others.
Hello, in the title it puts preferred instead of precedent